Moo Pak’s page 54 as to writing and all

Teorema de ü

I’ve done some Saturday morning early activity, which included organizing some of the thoughts and ideas that make you jump out of bed to start hitting the brain dump. And it took me places where things got organized: my notebook. I am a writer, a poet, and prophet. Or so I say. Among other things. I can always adapt depending on you interest. And on my day. Or the way I feel about disclosing A or B. Or in any case, I’m still figuring out what I am. Is that alright with you?

Well, to me it’s my natural state of doubt. I feel this is the catalyst of my behaviour. Or at least the pulsion of my writing. I have to come back to the the means for writing, wether the pen or the keyboard. It’s all a means of addressing how we interact with the instruments, the technology, and the self within. And sometime that’s a book. Reading.

Moo Pak has got me from the beginning. And I felt it hits close to home. But it also hits me in a way where I need to pause and think. I need to revise the references I know with the ones that sound familiar with the ones that completely fly over my head. But I don’t go out and explore and make a big analysis about them, or even look for the answers of my questions in Google or ChatGPT. It could be an interesting excercise, or at least a compelling list of future readings, but instead I come back to the basic feeling: to write.

And he writes as if he’s talking to his walking pal, the way I talk with a close friend where the conversation might take me where the extreme extrapolation of my mind feels like in the confort of a good listener and thinker. A talking/walking buddy. But the first element is in the thought process. The second in the writing. And somewhere in between you must always go back to the reading bit. And it keeps the cycle going. And so I’m here, talking like I’m walking, and writing, alas, as the time should be there for words to come to terms to what you are able to express in written form.

Text has become an everyman’s tool when they can plagarise all past writers that have been mined by big tech companies to reproduce the thoughts, style and writting of our greatest literary minds, and also to replicate the simple talk of regular people that have fed the beast with the posts, their articles, their entries in platforms, prompts, google questions, and so on and so forth. And so do i when I come here and blabber around for the kick of it, without actually getting any formal structure into my writting habits. Or maybe the other way around, not founding a habit to make my blurps clear and structure enough to actually write so other people could read.

But who cares, anyway. I fell I’m getting things done, and what I like about taking Moo Pak at my own slow pace is that I can make a habit on writting by reading one page at a time, and then come here to write, not necesarily about that page, but what it triggered: the need and feel for writing. That’s where the connection of the moving parts in your fingers puts your mind into a sense of trance. A special kind of letting go, that the finger tips control over the mind, or the other way around. You are just there witnessing what these two ends of your body are doing among them, without actually figuring out who’s in charge. That’s not my thought, bur rather one that came from page 54 of Moo Pak.

«Why, he says, does that sense of efficiency, of the skills of the hands, seems to be missing when one watches a painter of an sculpture at work?»

Gabriel Josipovici, MOO PAK

The hands of the writer, while wih the pen, or with the typewriter. The hand sof a painter, with a brush, or a sculpture with his hands or tools. I feel that connection, and I also tried, in modern terms, to mimick the possibility of becoming a artist. That is to actually do something with my hands: like painting or sculpting. But I haven’t got there yet. No as far as I know I can take this journey.

In in the mean time, I’ve also venture into writting. As much as a writter is when he’s dedicated some time to write. And then let’s see what happens. When the voice kicks in, and the thoughts and frameworks allow your narrative to emerge from the sense of being, from reading, from the life experiences, and all the other sources out there, but specially in here, that kick in this special notion of creating stories. Or rather text.

Text that can be written, but also text that can be read. Or even text that can be text. For the sake of letting the purpose of the writting show at whichever end of the person doing the reading feels like it. As if we can actually transform other peoples mind or perspective. That’s nonesense. But even while that’s not the intention, it is the only aspect that keeps me comming back to writing: to find myself in the process. And it always does.

So reading and writing are two side of the same coin. And I’m cotinuosly flipping it to see if at some point my luck is revealed in either side. And it always does. But that’s also my fault. Or the trick. To be there, self-aware, present. Pausing. Blabbling. Introducing the tempos of the expression that my mind puts into the words that come out, in a way, and not in another. The sense of this expression to become part of who you are, and who I am. Two sides of the same coin, even if you and me are not the same. Or the other way around.

«When you write every word, every letter even, has to be carefully sought for»…

I read the text and came here to cite it, and this is what came out. The games your memory plays on you.

When actually Josipovici wrote:

«When you write every word has to be carefully sought for, every letter even, if your spelling is as shaky as mine»

Turns out my spelling is just as shaky.

The truth is that’s absolutely bullshit. He’s lying as he’s master the way of writing as an expression that can be unleashed by the forces that take over once the fingers and the mind take control. Somehow, somewhere, you are there, in between, with the intention and the flow leaping back and forth to produce the right word and the proper language of what you are actually capable of producing: NEW language.

Or literature, that is. Or a simple story. Or a tale of two poles. A planet from a new perspective. A NEW look at the entirerity. Just because we can always find a new perspective on things. One that is particular for us. One that makes un unique and irreplaceable. A will of göd.

Let’s take a brand new start, like we are part of NEW new york song lullaby. A crooner with a soul for trust, hope and soul. A sort of prayer to negro soul and ancient covenants from the original priests. A prophet’s sigh. A sense of longing. Be-longing. To Bë.

ALLS

art002e015228 (April 6, 2026) – Seen from behind the Moon during Artemis II, the Moon and Earth align in the same frame, each partially illuminated by the Sun. The Moon’s surface appears in sharp detail in the foreground, while Earth sits much farther away, smaller and softly lit in the background. A faint reflection in the spacecraft window is also visible, subtly overlaying the scene. Though their phases differ, both are shaped by the same sunlight, revealing the geometry of the Sun–Earth–Moon system from deep space. Credit: NASA

About a thought

«Whenever we thing of thought, he says, we have before our eyes the image of Rodin’s Thinker, sitting immense and solitary with his great wise head in his great wise hand and gazing deep into himself.»

Moo Pak, Gabriel Josipovici

It’s certainly relevant. A thought. It’s as good as it gets. The inception of new idea. The consolidation of an inspiring new thought, there passing by for the first time in our human experience. And somehow magical.

But Moo Pak nails it, whether the narrator of the writer, or the universal connection between them, and us, plain readers of someone else’s thought. «It does not need Gilbert Ryle, he says, to show us that this image ins only and image of what those who have never had a thought in thier lives imagine the process of thinking to be».

That’s it. It’s not that at all. It’s not really there. Not the precise image, but rather what we hav socially simplify of what should be a very natural development for any human being.

«There is no such a thing as a pure thought, he says, there is only a sudden sharp intuition, a stirring of the blood, which you have to coax into shape, into words».

Precisely. It’s a scavenger hunt that you have not been prepared for. But you have trained yourself to capture them. To coax them into words. As a matter of life or death. The death of deepness in that thought, that if you are not able to recover, it will never be. It’s a dark road filled with intention and failure. «Most of the time you do not succeed. Either you cannot find the words or you find the words but they are not the right words for the feeling you have had».

But he idea is that sometimes when you are hit with one of those moments and actually nail it down to words, the feeling becomes complete: bigger than itself, as well as than yourself.

Such clarity to define the robust and simply nature of a thought. But from a precise persepctive. It’s not that the image of thought of the Thinker is vague, or that he goes out for a walk with a fried to thinkg. Or to come up with thoughts. He does it to talk. To talk and walk. And that has some rules on its own. A common set of rules that you share with the person you walk with, and his own context, problems, and circumstances. No script. No landmark. Just walk. Street. Life. What’s in your head. What’s become of you. What’s in the air?

And that links the two spaces in one. I mean Moo Pak. The idea of thought, as it emerges. But rather the relevance of walking with a friend, talking. That’s the deal. But not only. It’s when you go back to your desk, and you find yourself once again in the solitude of the alchemist producing the mixture of words to define the text that pursues the clarity, the brevity, the spotonness of the ideas, that now, become vividly connected with where we were before that walk. We need to be in places that await for us to link them with their sense of higher being. The final destination. The essence of a thought.

Walk, talk and desk. It’s about the written experience of that solitude, once you’ve done the letting go, the active listening, the silence-sharing, and the harmonizing beats of every step along the ride. And it’s also about aknowledging those places. About nourishing the spirits. Searching for the time to meet, to walk. And talk. In a sensible way friends fill in the time to let you be. And to listen. And to build from there. Whatever fulfills us. Whatever help we need. It’s all there.

Yet, the homework awaits.

You must come back.

A find the place. The time. The desk. And write.

Like this.

Like that.

ALLS

Walking and talking

An introduction to the walking podcast

Talking the walk and walking the talk

«At the same time, he says, unlike the strolls you are reduced to taking in a city like Paris or New York, you can walk at a decent pace in the London parks and on the London heaths, at the sort of pace that gets the blood flowing and there is nothing more conducive to good talk thatn the healthy flowing of the bood in the veins and a decent walking rhythm»

Moo Pak, Gabriel Josipovici

For quite some time, I’ve made walking a relevant aspect of my routine. Moreover, these walks have represented a way in which I could also improve the mental thought that pops up in any given walk you take. But explicity so, I’ve made a format that includes recording a podcast as the ultimate conversation within yourself, as an exploration to dedicate this thought to align the elements that converge between my current internal journey, my external interaction with society, as I walk to places where I’m suppose to go.

So when I go to work, in the time it takes me to go from my home to the bus stop, which is around 9 to 15 minutes, I launch another session of the Walking Podcast. «Hello, this is Golman, and welcome to another episode of the Walking Podcast. Talking the walk and walking the talk.» That’s my entry line in every episode. Then there’s nothing but the string of thought that comes with the day. This is no other that an immediate connection with the moment. Each step at a time. It’s a certain way to address that I am here, alive, and in this simple gesture, I will align myself with my inner forces to make of this day one that counts.

So that’s what I do. And they all turn out to be versions of the same conspiracy: what if we all could be actors of revelation of NEW collective framework that enables us to become active actors or a greater, fairer, gentler version of our humanity? What will it take for a collective instruments and mechanisms to bring out this emergent structure to reflect on change, impact and tranformation of our global ecosystem?

Yet, Jack Toledano talks about another type of walk. One you make with another person, to strike a conversation. I agree. That’s the most sympathetic way of striking a mood for the direct interaction between two people. The way in which you connect with other, by interacting with what’s in stake, whatever subject pops ups, that requires the immediacy of a response, and the pause and attention of a good listener, and the iteration of evolving feedback.

I’ve practiced those walks. I’ve been exploring the transit of my city, Barcelona, in order to understand the unfolding of each journey and pathways that interconnect the diversity of borroughs, as I understand that walking here is as rich as walking through London parks. It’s not a walking competition, but I’ve managed to do so by allowing myself to be doing those walks as an exploration of my surroundings, at first, and then as a possibility to show others that journey, with the sense of discovery and companionship, that one gets by simply breaking down through unchartered territories. And there, in those walks, the talks and conversations gain a new dimention.

Nietzsche perhaps overdid it, he says, as he overdid everything, in his insistence that the only thoughts worth preserving are those that come to one on walks and in his conviction that what was wrong with Descartes and Kant was that they refused ever to get off their backsides.

While Jack Toledano has something clear: «I personally, Jack says, don’t know what it means to think, either walking or sitting, but I know that the only way I can make anything that will cause other to think is sitting at my typewriter at my desk and the only way I can talk is walking.

The walking podcast